Free · Research-backed · ~10 minutes

Free IQ Test — Get Your Score in About 10 Minutes

Answer 33 reasoning questions and get an instant IQ score, your percentile, and a breakdown across four cognitive domains. The questions are modeled on ICAR, an open research framework, and everything is scored right in your browser.

About 10 minutes Four-domain profile Free to take Scored in your browser

Free, with no card required. You enter your email once to unlock your full result.

Free IQ test on IQ Test showing a sample cognitive reasoning question
ICAR-BASED · 33 ITEMS MEAN 100 · SD 15

Begin here

Your IQ test starts here

Thirty-three questions, four domains, one clear score at the end. No timer, no pressure.

Ready when you are. The test opens on its own page so you can focus — no timer, no rush.

Begin the test

33 QUESTIONS · ABOUT 10–15 MINUTES · INSTANT DETAILED RESULT

Where each of these figures actually comes from — and which of them were measured at all — is unpicked in the highest IQ ever recorded. For the numbers attached to politicians and CEOs, see Elon Musk, Trump and Joe Biden.

Why this test

Built on real science, respectful of your time

A credible cognitive check that doesn't bury your result behind a paywall.

Grounded in ICAR

The questions follow the International Cognitive Ability Resource, an open, peer-reviewed item bank that has been validated against clinical measures in studies with thousands of participants.

Around ten minutes

Thirty-three items spread across four domains. Long enough to mean something, short enough that you stay sharp from the first question to the last.

Free, no payment

Start the first question right away — there's no account to create and no charge at any point. To see your full result, you enter your email once.

Your detailed result

Scoring happens in your browser the moment you finish. Enter your email once to unlock your IQ score and your four domain results.

Modeled on the ICAR framework Free to take Your answers stay on your device

Four domains

Four sides of cognitive ability

Each domain captures a different facet of general intelligence, the trait psychologists call g.

Abstract reasoning

12 questions

Visual matrix puzzles that ask you to find the rule hiding inside a pattern. This is the single best window into fluid intelligence, the raw ability to reason through something you've never seen before.

Verbal reasoning

7 questions

Vocabulary and word-relationship items that test how well you handle language and draw connections between ideas. This side leans on both stored knowledge and live analytical thinking.

Numerical reasoning

7 questions

Number sequences and quantitative logic that check whether you can spot structure in figures, run quick mental arithmetic, and apply that thinking to unfamiliar problems.

Spatial reasoning

7 questions

Mental rotation and visualization tasks that measure how comfortably you turn shapes over in your mind, recognize them after a transformation, and read relationships in space.

Abstract reasoning carries the most weight because matrix puzzles are the cleanest single marker of fluid intelligence. The other three round out the picture so your score reflects a broad profile, not one talent.

The deep dive

Understanding IQ, honestly

What your number means, what it doesn't, and what the research actually says.

Making sense of your IQ score

IQ test chart: the bell curve showing how IQ scores spread around an average of 100

IQ scores ride a bell curve. The peak sits at 100, and most people gather within fifteen points of that center on either side. That fifteen is the standard deviation, and once you know it, the whole scale opens up. About 68 percent of the population lands between 85 and 115. Stretch the window to 70 and 130 and you've captured roughly 95 percent of everyone. Score above 130 or below 70 and you're in the rare two percent at either tail. Your position on this curve tells you how your reasoning stacked up against a large reference group on a particular set of tasks.

One number, though, hides a lot. Two people can post the exact same overall IQ and think in completely different ways. One might glide through the word puzzles while struggling with rotations; the other might be the reverse. That's the whole reason we hand back four separate domain scores. The headline figure tells you roughly where you stand. The breakdown tells you how you got there, and where your real strengths live.

It's worth holding onto what the score leaves out. Curiosity, persistence, the ability to read other people, the discipline to finish hard things — none of that registers on a reasoning test, and all of it shapes a life. Treat your result as one honest data point about how you handle certain puzzles. It is not a verdict on who you are.

How accurate are online IQ tests?

Quality on the open web runs the full range, from genuine research instruments to puzzles dressed up as science to harvest your email. The thing that tells them apart is the same thing that separates good science from bad: published methods, peer review, and validity data anyone can check. Our questions come from ICAR, the item bank built by researchers at Northwestern University and tested across study after study with thousands of participants.

How well does that translate to real measurement? ICAR items typically correlate with gold-standard clinical tests like the WAIS-IV in the range of 0.70 to 0.85. For a free, self-administered tool, that is a remarkably strong number. The items reward actual reasoning — spotting a pattern, holding a shape in your head, untangling a relationship — rather than trivia you either happen to know or you don't.

None of that turns an online test into a clinical exam. A professional assessment is run one-to-one, carefully timed, and read by a psychologist who knows your history and watches how you work, not just what you answer. So picture this test as a well-built screen: accurate enough to tell you something real, and honest enough to admit where its limits are.

The science behind intelligence

Intelligence test concept: interlocking gears representing the g factor of general cognitive ability

One stubborn finding has shaped the whole field: people who do well on one kind of mental task tend to do well on the others too. Charles Spearman spotted the pattern back in 1904 and named the shared thread g, for general intelligence. More than a century on, g is one of the most replicated results in all of psychology, propped up by enormous datasets and methods Spearman could never have run.

That hardly settles what intelligence is. Howard Gardner argued for at least eight separate intelligences, from linguistic to bodily-kinesthetic. Robert Sternberg proposed a three-part model splitting analytical, creative, and practical ability. The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory, which most modern tests lean on, tries to bring order to all of it by stacking broad and narrow abilities beneath the umbrella of g.

Pull the threads together and a picture emerges. Intelligence isn't one fixed thing sitting in your skull. It's a family of related abilities that travel together, shaped by genes and circumstances alike, and showing up differently depending on what you're trying to do. g is real and it matters, but it was never the full story of a mind.

Does IQ predict success?

IQ test and success: a climbing line chart suggesting the link between cognitive ability and achievement

Yes, with caveats worth taking seriously. A long run of research links higher IQ to more schooling, stronger job performance, and higher lifetime earnings. People who score well tend, on average, to study longer, earn more, and live longer. The correlation between IQ and job performance sits around 0.50, which by the standards of social science is a heavyweight number.

Averages, though, paper over wild variation between individuals. Plenty of people with middling scores build rich, accomplished lives on grit, social intelligence, and the kind of practical wisdom no test can capture. Plenty of high scorers stall out on bad decisions, work they hate, or quiet unhappiness. The pull of IQ on success is a bit like the pull of height on basketball: it helps, sometimes a great deal, and it's nowhere near the only thing in the room.

Here's a framing that holds up. IQ tends to set the ceiling on how complex a job you can learn to do well. Personality and motivation decide whether you actually go and do it. Both matter, but over the length of a career, character has a habit of outrunning raw horsepower.

Does a high IQ make you happier?

Here the research is humbling. Across large studies, the link between IQ and day-to-day well-being is barely there, hovering near zero. Being smarter does not reliably make you happier. If anything, a sharp mind can carry its own freight: more rumination, a keener eye for everything that's wrong, and the odd loneliness of seeing patterns the people around you don't.

So what does move the needle on happiness? The findings point, again and again, to the same handful of things: close relationships, a sense of purpose, decent health, and what gets called emotional intelligence — the ability to manage your own feelings and move through social life without constant friction. None of those tracks tightly with IQ. You can be brilliant and miserable, or perfectly ordinary on a reasoning test and deeply content.

That isn't a knock on cognitive ability. Understanding the world is its own quiet reward, and there's real pleasure in cracking a hard problem or finally grasping a difficult idea. But if you're taking this test hoping a high number will lift how you feel about your life, the truthful answer is that it probably won't. Contentment is assembled out of different materials.

How our IQ test works

IQ test questions: examples of abstract matrix, verbal, numerical and spatial reasoning items

The test runs 33 items drawn from the ICAR framework and spread across four domains: abstract, verbal, numerical, and spatial reasoning. Every item has exactly one correct answer. Your raw score is simply the count you get right, and we convert that count to the deviation-IQ scale (average 100, standard deviation 15) using a calibration curve aligned to ICAR research. The exact item families and the scoring maths are laid out in full on our methodology page.

The four domains don't carry equal weight. Abstract reasoning, the visual matrix puzzles, takes the largest share of items because matrix problems are the strongest single signal of fluid intelligence — your ability to reason through something genuinely new. Verbal, numerical, and spatial items fill out the rest so the test reads your whole cognitive profile rather than a single narrow band.

All of the scoring runs on your device. Your answers are processed locally, and your IQ score and domain breakdown appear the instant you finish. There's no round trip to a server because there doesn't need to be. You get your result immediately, and your data never leaves your hands. We spell out exactly what we do and don't collect in our privacy policy, down to the short list of values the test keeps in your browser, which the cookie policy names one by one.

Can you actually improve your IQ?

The evidence here is kinder than the "intelligence is fixed" cliché suggests. Your genes set a broad range, but where you land inside that range owes a lot to environment and experience. Studies show that staying in school can lift IQ by a few points for each additional year, and that rich early-childhood environments leave gains that last.

Neuroplasticity — the brain's habit of rewiring itself as it forms new connections — means cognitive skills are trainable, within limits. Regular mental challenge, picking up new skills, exercise, real sleep, and decent nutrition all help maintain and modestly sharpen how you think. In adulthood the effects are small rather than spectacular, but they're real and they add up.

What doesn't deliver, despite the marketing, is repetitive brain-training games. The research is fairly blunt: getting better at a specific training task rarely transfers to general intelligence. The things that genuinely seem to help are broader and less gimmicky — reading widely, learning an instrument, working through real mathematics, wrestling with hard problems at your job, and keeping your body active. The brain, like any other organ, responds to how you use it.

The scale

IQ classification table

How scores are grouped under the standard WAIS-IV system. For the same bands with percentiles and population shares, see the full IQ score chart.

The IQ bell curveA normal distribution centered on 100, with most scores between 85 and 115 and rare scores below 70 or above 130.7085100115130AVERAGE · 100IQ SCORE · MEAN 100 · SD 15
Two out of three people score between 85 and 115; only about 2% land above 130.
RangeClassificationPercentileWhat it means
130+Very SuperiorTop 2%Exceptional reasoning ability. People here tend to excel at abstract problems, complex analysis, and academic work. Many researchers and senior professionals score in this band.
120–129SuperiorTop 6–9%Well above the average. Common among people who thrive in intellectually demanding fields and pick up new concepts quickly and with little friction.
110–119High AverageTop 16–25%Above the mean without being unusual. This range is typical of university graduates and people in knowledge-heavy roles.
90–109Average25th–75th pctThe broad middle of the curve, where about half of everyone falls. A score here reflects solid, ordinary cognitive functioning.
80–89Low Average9th–25th pctBelow the mean but inside the normal range. Fast or highly abstract tasks may feel harder, though everyday functioning is unaffected.
70–79Borderline2nd–9th pctNoticeably below average. Complex reasoning can be a struggle, and a professional evaluation may be worth it if there are functional concerns.
Below 70Extremely LowBottom 2%May point to an intellectual disability when paired with real limits in daily adaptive skills. A full clinical assessment is essential before any diagnosis.

These labels describe a statistical position on a curve. They are not measures of worth, potential, or character.

For fun

IQ scores people love to cite

Take every number below with a healthy pinch of salt. Most are popular estimates rather than verified results, and several were never measured at all.

1

Terence Tao

IQ ~230Mathematician

Often described as the finest living mathematician, Tao was solving university-level problems by age nine and won the Fields Medal in 2006.

2

Marilyn vos Savant

IQ ~228Author & columnist

Once listed by Guinness for the highest recorded IQ, she built a following with her long-running "Ask Marilyn" column.

3

Christopher Hirata

IQ ~225Astrophysicist

A prodigy who took gold at the International Physics Olympiad at 13 and was working with NASA on Mars projects by 16.

4

Leonardo da Vinci

IQ ~200 (est.)Polymath

Retrospective guesses place him somewhere between 180 and 220. His notebooks roam from anatomy to engineering to flight with equal ease.

5

Kim Ung-Yong

IQ ~210Engineer, former prodigy

A childhood Guinness record-holder who was auditing university physics lectures at three and working with NASA as a teenager.

6

Garry Kasparov

IQ ~190Chess grandmaster

Widely held to be the greatest chess player ever, Kasparov became the youngest undisputed world champion at 22.

7

Albert Einstein

IQ ~160 (est.)Theoretical physicist

He never sat a modern IQ test. The figure of about 160 is a back-calculation from his work on relativity and quantum theory — we traced it in Albert Einstein’s IQ.

8

Stephen Hawking

IQ ~160 (est.)Cosmologist

Hawking once joked that people who brag about their IQ are losers — even as his own estimated score sat near 160.

FAQ

Questions, answered

Everything worth knowing before you take the test.

What is an IQ test?

An IQ test is a standardized way to estimate how well you reason, spot patterns, and solve problems you haven't seen before. IQ is short for intelligence quotient. Early versions divided a child's mental age by their actual age, which is where the word quotient comes from. Today the math is different: your answers are compared against a large reference sample and placed on a bell curve with an average of 100.

What does IQ stand for?

IQ is short for intelligence quotient. The psychologist William Stern coined the term in 1912 to describe the ratio between a person's mental age and their actual age. The quotient label has stuck around even though modern scoring no longer divides one number by another. Your result simply reflects how your performance ranks against everyone else who has taken comparable items.

How accurate is the IQ Test IQ test?

It's built on ICAR, an open, peer-reviewed item bank that lines up well with clinical tests such as the WAIS-IV. Independent studies have reported reliability and validity that hold up across large samples. It's a strong screening instrument, not a diagnosis. Read your result as a well-informed estimate, and see a licensed psychologist if you need a formal evaluation.

How long does the test take?

Most people finish the 33 questions in eight to twelve minutes. There's no countdown, so you can sit with a tricky item as long as you like. One practical tip: trust your first read on pattern questions. People who second-guess every answer usually do worse than people who commit and move on.

What does my IQ score actually mean?

Your score shows where you land on a bell curve compared with the general population. The midpoint is 100, and roughly two out of three people score between 85 and 115. A result above 130 puts you in the top two percent or so. The number describes performance on a particular set of tasks. It says nothing about your worth, your character, or how far you'll go in life.

What are the IQ score ranges and classifications?

Using the WAIS-IV bands: 130 and above is Very Superior and sits in the top two percent. 120 to 129 is Superior. 110 to 119 is High Average. 90 to 109 is the Average band where about half of everyone falls. 80 to 89 is Low Average, 70 to 79 is Borderline, and below 70 is classified as Extremely Low. Each label marks a statistical position, nothing more.

Can my IQ change over time?

Some of it can. Fluid reasoning, the kind you use on brand-new problems, tends to peak in your twenties and then ease downward. Crystallized knowledge, meaning your vocabulary and accumulated expertise, usually keeps climbing for decades. Schooling, a stimulating environment, and regular hard thinking all leave a measurable mark, so a single score is a snapshot rather than a life sentence.

Is the test really free?

Yes. Taking the test costs nothing and we never ask for a card or any payment. The only step before your full result is entering your email once on the results screen, which we use to send you your score. There's no charge at any point.

Do I have to sign up or give an email?

There's no account to create and no password, so you jump straight into the first question. To see your full result, you enter your email once on the results screen, and we use it to send you your score. That's the only thing we ask for.

How is the test scored?

Each of the 33 questions has one right answer. We count your correct responses, then map that raw total onto the deviation-IQ scale using a calibration curve aligned to the familiar average of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. You also get a separate score for each of the four domains, which is where you find out whether your verbal side or your spatial side is doing the heavy lifting.

Which cognitive domains does the test measure?

Four of them. Abstract reasoning covers visual matrix patterns. Verbal reasoning covers vocabulary and word relationships. Numerical reasoning covers sequences and quantitative logic. Spatial reasoning covers mental rotation and visualizing shapes. Together they sketch a rounded picture of your general cognitive ability rather than one narrow slice.

Can I retake the test?

You can, but a word of caution: once you've seen the items, your second score tends to drift upward simply because the questions feel familiar. Treat your first sitting as the honest one. If you do come back, leave a gap of a few months so the specific puzzles have faded from memory.

How does this compare to the WAIS or Stanford-Binet?

The WAIS-IV and the Stanford-Binet are administered one-to-one by a trained psychologist and run for an hour or more. They remain the gold standard for diagnosis. Our test draws on the same family of validated reasoning items and correlates well with those clinical tools, which makes it a dependable screen. It doesn't replace the adaptive questioning or professional interpretation you get in a full assessment.

Is IQ the same thing as intelligence?

Not quite. An IQ test captures a specific cluster of abilities, the reasoning and pattern skills that psychologists summarize as g. Real intelligence is wider than any single figure. Creativity, emotional insight, street smarts, and the knack for reading a room all count for a lot, and none of them show up cleanly on a standard IQ test.

What counts as a good IQ score?

It depends on what you're asking. A score of 100 is dead average, and most people land between 85 and 115. Anything above 120 is genuinely strong and puts you in roughly the top ten percent. Honestly, though, the chase for a magic number misses the point. The useful takeaway from a test like this is your profile, not a single threshold to clear.

What is the average IQ score?

The average is 100 by design. Test makers periodically re-norm the scale so the population mean stays put at 100 with a standard deviation of 15. In practice that means about half of all people score between 90 and 110, and roughly 95 percent fall between 70 and 130.

Does IQ predict career success?

It nudges the odds. Decades of research tie higher scores to more schooling, better job performance, and higher pay on average. The link is real but loose. Drive, conscientiousness, social skill, and plain luck often decide the outcome, and in plenty of fields they matter more than raw reasoning. Cognitive ability opens doors; what you do once you're through them is on you.

Is intelligence nature or nurture?

Both, and the two are tangled. Twin studies put the heritable share of IQ variation somewhere between 50 and 80 percent, with the figure shifting by age and circumstance. Genes don't act in a vacuum, though. The same genetic potential plays out very differently depending on nutrition, schooling, and a stable home. Inheritance sets a range; environment decides where inside that range you land.

What is the Flynn effect?

It's the steady rise in average IQ scores recorded across most of the twentieth century, on the order of three points per decade. Better nutrition, more years of schooling, and growing comfort with abstract problems are the usual explanations. Curiously, several wealthy countries have seen the trend flatten or even reverse in recent decades, and researchers are still arguing about why.

Does IQ decline with age?

Parts of it slow down. Fluid reasoning, the speed you bring to unfamiliar problems, softens gradually after your mid-twenties. Crystallized intelligence, your store of words and know-how, often keeps growing into your sixties and beyond. The practical result is that an older mind may be slower on a timed puzzle yet sharper on anything that rewards judgment and experience.

What is the history of IQ testing?

It began in 1905, when Alfred Binet and Théodore Simon built a test to find French schoolchildren who needed extra help. Lewis Terman reworked it into the Stanford-Binet in 1916, and David Wechsler launched his own scales in 1939. The field has matured a great deal since then, and it has also had to confront an ugly chapter in which testing was bent toward eugenics and discrimination.

Any tips for getting an accurate score?

Take it rested, alert, and somewhere quiet. Don't rush, but don't agonize either; if a question stumps you, make your best guess and keep going. Skip it right after a heavy meal or late at night when your focus is gone. Most of all, come at it with curiosity rather than dread, because anxiety drags scores down.

What is the ICAR framework?

ICAR stands for the International Cognitive Ability Resource. It's an open, public-domain pool of cognitive items developed by a research group led by William Revelle at Northwestern University. The items are free for scientific and educational use, have been validated across multiple studies, and correlate strongly with commercial tests. In effect, ICAR opened up serious psychometrics to everyone.

Can I take the test on my phone?

Yes. The layout is fully responsive, the tap targets are sized for thumbs, and nothing scrolls sideways on a small screen. A few spatial questions reward a larger display, so a tablet or laptop gives you a slightly easier look at the fine detail, but a phone works perfectly well.

What happens to my data?

Your individual answers are scored in your browser and aren't sent anywhere. The one piece of personal data we collect is the email you enter to unlock your result, which is sent securely to our form provider so we can deliver your score. We don't ask for your name, and we don't collect anything else — the full details are in our privacy policy.

An educational tool, not a clinical diagnosis

IQ Test gives you a well-grounded estimate of your cognitive ability, not a medical or psychological diagnosis. If you have concerns about cognition, learning, or development — for yourself or someone you care for — speak with a licensed psychologist or physician who can carry out a full, individual assessment.

References

The research behind this test

Our items and scoring follow published, peer-reviewed work on cognitive measurement.

  1. Condon, D. M., & Revelle, W. (2014). The International Cognitive Ability Resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure. Intelligence, 43, 52–64. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.004
  2. Dworak, E. M., Revelle, W., Doebler, P., & Condon, D. M. (2021). Using the International Cognitive Ability Resource as an open-source tool to explore individual differences in cognitive ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 109906. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109906
  3. Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97(3), 404–431. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.404
  4. Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1–22. doi:10.1037/h0046743
  5. Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35(1), 13–21. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001

Ready?

Ready to see your number?

Thirty-three questions, about ten minutes, and an honest score waiting at the end. Free, with no payment and no catch.

Take the free IQ test